Tuesday, December 29, 2009

V's Pick #1: The Time It Snowed in Puerto Rico by Sarah McCoy


So, I must admit that I haven't been able to keep a book going since I read Vonnegut's Galapagos around um, August. Don't get me wrong, I've picked up about 40 books since, but turns out, I've become 1.) easily bored with reading and 2.) totally impatient with writing that doesn't grab me by the heart in the first few sentences. I didn't fully realize the effects that the last year of speed-reading and skimming (oh, grad school) had on me until this blog. I've been trying to find a book to read for almost three weeks now and nothing has been sticking. Honestly, I was starting to kind of panic, wondering if I've lost my reading mojo, if I've underlined and annotated so much that I can't just READ anymore. Then, I found this book on a random library trip and while I can't say I "couldn't put it down" (because I did, often, it's 200 pages took me almost 2 weeks to get through and it's not a tough read)...I can say that I stuck with it.

11 year-old Verdita narrates this coming-of-age tale which takes place in PR in the 1960s. She struggles to understand her own spirituality in her Catholic/ mystic barrio: "I guessed if you prayed long and hard enough you could change the color of wood" -- "I was supposed to pray but I heard Elvis in my head."

She sees her parents having sex: "She had stolen him, swept him under her ocean."

She loves all things American: "Maybe the food grew from American beans - fields of friend onions and hamburger buns."

She drinks for the first time: "Coconut fire candy!"

She wants to look American: "Straight and blonde to my shoulders."

She discovers her body: "The softness grew hard, and I noticed a lump beneath each tip. Breasts!"

She deals with new life and new death: "Orange like a new sun. I think his twin sister is the moon. She let him rise, but it meant she couldn't stay."

...and that's just a small sample. To experience her story is to taste the rice and beans, to understand what snow means on an island and to feel the hot breath of the Chupacabra. McCoy's writing seduces you into Verdita's poetic and introspective, curious and (mostly) brave world; it spills forth a tale we can all relate to...trying to find yourself among the people who have made you who you are while at the same time, knowing that those people may hold you back from who you want to become. Sin and survival, nature and corn husks, heels and magic, The Time It Snowed in Puerto Rico will remind you of a time when you too, wanted to shed your skin to grow up.

Erin's Book #1: Zeitoun by Dave Eggers

Zeitoun is quite possibly the most terrifying book I have ever read.

Dave Eggers is one of my favorite authors, so I thought Zeitoun would be the perfect choice for my first selection. Eggers is known for a variety of things - editing McSweeney's, writing screenplays (Away We Go, Where the Wild Things Are), and books (memoir, fiction, and my favorite - What is the What -a nonfiction/fiction hybrid).

What is the What is a brilliant and frightening look at a real-life Sudanese refugee. Zeitoun offers a just as frightening story a bit closer to home - New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina. And unlike What is the What, this one's all true.

Abdulrahman Zeitoun is a Muslim man from Syria, who runs a contracting business with his American Muslim wife, Kathy. Together they have 3 daughters, plus a son from Kathy's previous marriage. The two are upstanding citizens and make a strong family. Due to the nature of their business, when Katrina approaches, Zeitoun (as he is known) feels unable to leave New Orleans. So Kathy takes the kids and heads out to stay with family, while Zeitoun tries to protect their house and help those in need.

What follows is an incredible account of the storm, as well as the unbelievable mismanagement of those left behind. We've all heard the horror stories of how unprepared and irresponsible FEMA was. I was prepared for reading about elderly couples trapped in their attics, starving dogs unable to escape, houses completely flooded, and even for the roving gangs of armed men, looting and killing. What I was not prepared for were the tragic stories of innocent men and women arrested in their own homes, not granted phone calls or even told of the charges against them, being imprisoned in Guantanamo Bay-style cages, efficiently and impressively built while victims drowned and starved in their homes.

Eggers worked on this book for 3 years, interviewing those involved to weave the story. Obviously we can't be 100% sure that everything happened exactly as was written, but even if it was mostly true, and it certainly appears to be, this is a truly shocking horrific event. I couldn't believe that these things were happening in modern-day America and that I hadn't heard more about it.

It was also interesting timing. I read this book while I was home for Christmas. Surrounded by gifts and holiday cheer, the devastation and terrible treatment these men received hit home even harder. While I was excited about a new dress, I was reading about a family who had lost everything they owned and didn't know if they would ever lay eyes on each other again. Zeitoun is a great reminder of the important things in life, as well as a reminder that, in today's society of fear, none of us is as free as we like to think.

Monday, December 28, 2009

Holly's Book 1: She's Come Undone by Wally Lamb

Wally Lamb's debut novel, She's Come Undone, is something I've been meaning to read for ages. It's been on my "To Read" list for years, a book mentioned in passing by older family and friends and referenced on occasion in my Contemporary American Women's Fiction class last semester. I'm not entirely sure why I didn't read it sooner, because it's been sitting on my shelf for years. Maybe I was intimidated by its size (465 pages - that's kind of big, right...?) or its cover (a woman's head floating bizarrely in a cloudy sky above a bright blue ocean), but whatever it was, I'm glad I finally got over my fears. She's Come Undone is an easy read, and pretty darn good in a book-clubby way.


The novel begins with Dolores Price as a child, smart-alecky and sure of herself, dealing with the effects of her parents' marital problems. From there, it follows her journey through failed relationships, trauma, death, and ultimately, mental and physical recovery from the harm inflicted upon her by others and by herself. With Dolores, it seems that growth is a one-step-forward, two-steps-back sort of deal - and at times, reading about her extended recovery annoyed me. Looking back, though, I have to appreciate it. That's the way life is and the way people are: damaged, damaging, growing and ungrowing and growing again. And Dolores is quirky and entertaining throughout, even (sometimes especially) at her most apathetic.


While Dolores is a character entertaining enough to sustain the novel by herself, I loved most of the characters she develops relationships with, all of whom affect her in one way or another. The cast of secondary characters ranges from the obvious (mother, father, grandmother) to the more obscure (high school guidance counselor, wall paper hanger, even a beached whale). Again, true to life, some of these characters stick around and understand their impact, while some merely pass through Dolores's life. All are well-developed and interesting in their own right, but they became more interesting as the story progressed and I saw more and more clearly how they fit like puzzle pieces into Dolores's journey. In this novel, Wally Lamb manages to time everything perfectly without making anything seem contrived.


One of the things that most amazed me about this novel was the author's gender. Maybe this seems unenlightened of me, but for the first hundred pages or so I had to keep checking the author's photo for proof of his masculinity - and every time, there was Mr. Lamb staring back at me. I know that men can write female characters and women can write male characters, etc etc. But there's something almost unsettling and almost amazing about the extent to which Lamb accesses a female voice/perspective/experience, writing this character's growth and development over 30-plus years from childhood into adulthood. In Dolores, I recognized myself and the women around me; more than that, though, I caught glimpses of things I'd forgotten from childhood and things from adulthood that I have yet to deal with. How is it that Lamb knows things about being a woman that I didn't know until I read them in his book? How ever Lamb does it, Dolores rings true from the first page to the last.


A lot of crap happens to Dolores in She's Come Undone - and at times, Dolores herself does "come undone." Even though the novel chronicles her journey well into adulthood, I think it could accurately be categorized as a coming-oh-age story. It takes time for Dolores to deal fully with the trauma she experiences as a young girl, and that, in essence, is what this book is about: a woman learning, finally, to be okay with who she is and who she has been.

Blythe's Book 3: This is Where I Leave You by Jonathon Tropper



I was first introduced to Jonathon Tropper’s work through the book club I’m a part of. We read Everything Changes, and it was a real hit amongst our group. I found his latest novel, Tropper’s latest novel, This is Where I Leave You, just as pleasing. Life changing? No. Satisfying? Absolutely. His novels typically center around dysfunctional families. And while these families tend to have huge issues, I think they pretty much resemble the frustrations and breakdowns each family endures, just magnified times two hundred. Or more.

One of my favorite things about Jonathon Tropper’s writing is that he makes it so easy to picture the characters he creates. While reading Everything Changes, it was like watching a movie—I just knew Ben and Jerry Stiller were the father and son. No question about it. Same thing with This is Where I Leave You—Jessica Walters, Joan Cusack, and Owen Wilson all play prominent parts. As a matter of fact, Tropper is currently developing the novel into a motion picture, and I will be shocked if I don’t have at least one of those right—that’s how vivid his writing is.

This is Where I Leave You follows the Foxman family as they sit shiva after the death of the head of the household, Mort Foxman. This requires Judd, the main character, to stay in the same house as his child-psychologist mother, three estranged siblings, and their spouses for a full week. Add to this that he is in the middle of divorcing his wife, who was having an affair with his boss, and you can see how the plot may thicken. The resentments and miscommunications between these siblings are epic, with most of their familial problems stemming from adolescent injuries and disappointments. The great thing is, although most of us don’t have quite as much drama in our lives, Tropper is able to bring this family to life in a way where you’re going, “Yeah! That’s EXACTLY how it is!” (even if it really isn’t.) There may not be fist fights, strange sex acts, and pot-smoking at temple in most families, but the snarky comments, hurt feelings, and sibling bullying that abound in this novel certainly had a ring of truth about them.

Another favorite topic of Tropper’s is the vulnerability of being in love, and how marriage can change a person and a relationship in so many ways. The common threads of marriage—the daily ins and outs—are captured perfectly, even as Judd and Jen try to go their separate ways. Saying things simply to hurt one another without considering whether or not you mean them… getting annoyed by things as ridiculous as clothes in the wrong hamper… fixating on how things were versus how they are… Tropper puts into words the intricate negotiations, compromises, and tested loyalties that all relationships experience.

Without giving anything away, the thing I really enjoyed about this novel is that Tropper is insistent ‘til the end that things don’t get much easier. There is no happily-ever-after perfect ending. Instead, there’s just life, with all of its complications and heartache. Old wounds may heal, but there are still scars; a week can bring a family closer, but it won’t change who that family is. Judd admits in the beginning that his family is callous and handles emotional issues poorly: “There is no occasion calling for sincerity that the Foxman family won’t quickly diminish or pervert through our own genetically engineered brand of irony and evasion. We banter, quip, and insult our way through the birthdays, holidays, weddings, illnesses. Now Dad is dead and Wendy is cracking wise. It serves him right, since he was something of a pioneer at the forefront of emotional repression” (1). By the end, Judd’s family has not changed. They may be a bit more open with each other, they may have faced some issues that a week spent together forced out in to the open… but it is easy to see that, once they go their separate ways, their old defense mechanisms and sibling issues will resurface, although perhaps a bit less so than before. Rather than finding this disheartening, I was comforted. We’re all human, all have our hang-ups, and are inevitably going to be who we already are. The good news? Our family will stick by us through it all and we’ll all find someone to accept us as we are. And if nothing else, our family issues will always make for a good story.

Saturday, December 26, 2009

Blythe's Book 2: The Lacuna by Barbara Kingsolver



So, I should probably start with an apology and a disclaimer: I promise to not follow Pam’s reading list, but I had to read this novel as soon as I got it-- the library's Christmas treat to me. I absolutely love Barbara Kingsolver. Call her blasphemous, sacrilegious, a liberal, whatever. I think she’s pure genius. If you don’t like her work, you may not enjoy reading any farther. Consider yourself forewarned, because I will now sing Kingsolver’s praises.

Kingsolver’s newest novel, The Lacuna, follows the life of a young man named Harrison Shepherd. Allow me to provide a two-second summary: Harrison, a Mexican-America, is raised by a single mother in Mexico, works as a cook/ personal assistant in the Rivera/Kahlo/ Trotsky compound as a young man, and then moves to America, where he becomes a famous author. In his early thirties, his earlier association with the Riveras and Trotskys makes him an easy target in the anti-Communist forties and fifties, and the majority of the book focuses on the tensions surrounding Communism in America and abroad.

I’ve been reading dystopian novels with my students this year—specifically, Anthem and Fahrenheit 451—and my students were quick to identify flaws in our society that mirrored those being critiqued in the novels. I was amazed at how many similar themes Kingsolver elicited in The Lacuna. Much of her novel provides commentary on the press—how quick we are to believe anything that’s written, how very few checks there are on journalists in general, and the danger that may follow if we fail to discern between truth and fabrication. This is a favorite theme in Fahrenheit 451 as well. Bradbury suggests that if we meekly swallow whatever is printed, or said, without ever pausing to consider, then we will fall prey to whoever speaks the loudest. The main character of The Lacuna, Harrison, notes, “The radio is at the root of the evil, their rules is: No silence, ever. When anything happens, the commentator has to speak without a moment’s pause for gathering wisdom. Falsehood and insanity are preferable to silence. You can’t imagine the effect of this. The talkers are rising above the thinkers” (324). Not only does this echo Fahrenheit 451, which was eerily prescient, but it seems so appropriate in this day and age. We are surrounded by empty noise, and rather than running in the opposite direction, we, as a nation, just crank the volume higher. Kingsolver later writes, “people love to read about sins and error, but not their own” (337). By framing her ideas in 1940s America, she carefully avoids pointing the finger at us. Directly, that is. Who can help but think of the talking heads, the hate-mongers on the radio and the news shows who never cease talking? I remember sitting in front of the TV on 9/11, thinking that something new would be said if I kept tuned in; but it was just noise, noise, noise. I finally turned the TV off and took a walk, knowing there would be the same footage, the same accusations from the left, the right, the in-between, awaiting my return. Reading The Lacuna gave me a better understanding of how our society took shape, and what the perils of being obsessed with being “tuned in” are. She put into words my despair over what I see as a total dependency on technology, an unfailing allegiance to what “he” or “she” said—the assumption that if it’s printed, it must be true.

And this is what makes Kingsolver novels so great. Barbara Kingsolver is a master at making readers see the other side of the equation, insisting we question our assumptions. After reading Poisonwood Bible, one wonders, is missionary work a type of colonizing? Is it more important to proselytize or to act with Christian charity and hope others catch on? After reading The Lacuna, one wonders, what have I been spoon-fed over the years? What “truths” have I unquestioningly accepted?

Other assertions she makes through her characters and storyline—that the U.S. basically engaged in an outrageous witch hunt during the Red scare, that your words can and may be used against you—come as no surprise. However, the way she frames these concepts and concerns are what make her a master. Kingsolver always makes the political personal, putting a face on Trotsky, Kahlo, and war-beleaguered America. In Kingsolver’s novels, there is seldom a villain, or if there is, she always complicates matters by showing the backstory, insisting that nothing is as simple as good and bad, right and wrong. I think this is what I love about her work—coming away from a Kingsolver novel, I always feel as if she’d rather her readers think than simply agree; rather they question than consent. Was the U.S. at fault? Was Communism the problem? As Kingsolver suggests, it’s never so simple as “yes” or “no.”

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Pam's Book 2: American Wife

Before reading this book, the only thing I knew, or thought I knew, about Laura Bush was that she seemed like a pretty classy lady, far classier than her husband. American Wife, a fictionalized account of the former First Lady's life, left me with the same impression.

Alice Lindgren grows up in small-town Wisconson, marries Charlie Blackwell, unwillingly (sort of) becomes the First Lady. The first third of the book describes Alice's single days, including her childhood. The second third is dedicated to the Blackwell marriage. The final third is, of course, about the Blackwell presidency. Something I liked and disliked about this book was that I couldn't make up my mind how I felt about Alice. Some protagonists engender deep feelings in the reader, a passionate admiration (Lizzy Bennet) or a passionate distaste (Scarlett O'Hara). Alice inspired neither in me. I suppose that probably makes her a more realistic figure, but I find this profound ambivalence rather unsettling. Alice is never a very strong character.

From the beginning she is dominated by friends (Dena), family members (her grandmother), boyfriends, husband, and the annoying thing is that she never seems to realize it. I suppose she has some secret reservoir of strength (after all, how else could she survive accidentally killing the love of her teenage life?), but it seems to stem from more from denial than anything else. For example, it takes her years to realize that her husband is an alcoholic ne'er-do-well, and she is shocked to hear her mother-in-law coldly inform her that Charlie had "married up." As soon as she makes up her mind to leave her husband, he finds Jesus and all is forgiven (despite the fact that Alice isn't exactly religious herself). Then, suddenly, she finds herself swept along in her husband's wake as he becomes first the governor and than the president. She has the strength not to vote for him, but is too weak to admit this to anybody. She has the strength to have an abortion as a teenager, but cannot even tell her own daughter, much less the world. She has the strength to admit her stance on the war, but only (ostensibly) in private to a man she doesn't realize will soon tell the world. She also had a face lift, which annoys me to no end. Why can't people learn to age gracefully?

Anyway, after reading the book I was of course curious how much was fact and how much was fiction. Curtis Sittenfeld maintains that 85% is fiction. Laura Bush really did kill a classmate in a car accident. The Bushes really do have a large northeastern retreat. Barbara Bush really is, apparently, or can be, a major bitch. I don't know about the abortion. Many people, including myself, were disturbed by the sex scenes. I have no problem with a well-written, appropriately placed sex scene in general, but imposing the face of "W" onto Charlie Blackwell was more than a little revolting. In an interview with Newsweek, Sittenfeld says, laughing, "No, you're imagining the president! I'm able to separate fiction and reality. I guess it remains to be seen if other people are." (http://www.newsweek.com/id/156938/page/1). Well, guess what, Curtis. If you wanted to write fiction, maybe you should have written 100% fiction. You are the one who has blurred the line between fiction and reality. What do you expect?

Thursday, December 17, 2009

Blythe's Book 1: Cleaving by Julie Powell



Every once in a while I come across a book that I can’t put down, even though I desperately want to. Cleaving, by Julie Powell, is one of those books. I first fell in love, or at least deep like, with Julie in her memoir, Julie and Julia. I loved her dry wit, her spazzy panic attacks when things didn’t go as expected, her casual use of profanity—as you may guess, I felt like I’d found a kindred spirit. Perhaps what really won me over, though, was the relationship she and her husband, Eric, had built. They’d been together since high school and just seemed so in sync. Two sides to the same coin. When she broke down, he made her laugh; when she was stressed, he opened a bottle (or two) of wine; when she pulled some bullshit crybaby fit, he told her to buck up and get over it. He didn’t take her crap, but he loved her for it. In other words, if I fell in love with Julie, I fell in love with Eric as well.

So. Imagine how painful a follow-up would be if said favorite couple went from being cozy in a rundown NY loft, cooking and slumming together to living in separate apartments, leading separate lives, as Julie has both meaningful and meaningless sexual encounters with men as she tries to figure out what she wants. Don’t worry—I’m not giving away anything you wouldn’t pick up on in, oh say, the first chapter. Julie runs into an old college “friend,” begins a torrid affair (complete with graphic descriptions), and when it fizzles out, finds herself making some painfully destructive decisions as she navigates what comes after. Never does she let Eric go, though, nor does he choose to leave, which makes it all the harder to continue reading.

It’s not that I’m so prudish or conventional that I can’t stand the thought of reading about infidelity. Heck, there have been plenty of times a kinky little affair in a novel has intrigued me, kept me interested in the plot. And, as many of you know, I am a closet-addict of “General Hospital”… so I can handle fictional indiscretions just fine. The problem lies in the fact that this was not fictional—not a plot device, or a silly fantasy. This was Julie and Eric, struggling, unwilling or unable to call it quits, and so, instead, torturing and healing each other in turns.

I will admit, from a literary standpoint, the butcher analogy does work. As Julie tears her life apart and then tries to transform the bits of gristle and bone into something beautiful, I did see that taking shape. Although I started out HATING this book, and wanting to find Julie and punch her in the face, I was left a bit more conflicted; maybe it’s not her job to get it all right, or to be Eric’s perfect match. Maybe all she, and we, can do is try to learn, and grow, and face our mistakes with honesty. (And I should confess that although I say this, and ended the book on a high note emotionally, overall I’m still a little pissed!)

On a side note, if you’re squeamish, this aint the book for you. I found the butchery sections (which are at least half the book) fascinating, but there is a whole lot of blood ‘n’ guts being described. And, if nothing else, Jules is candid.

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Pam's Book #1: The Lacuna by Barbara Kingsolver

The radio is at the root of the evil, their rule is: No silence, ever. When anything happens, the commentator has to speak without a moment's pause for gathering wisdom. Falsehood and inanity are preferable to silence. You can't imagine the effect of this. The talkers are rising above the thinkers.


"Well, five years of wartime censorship. Old habits die hard. We've gotten good at pretending everything is shipshape here. Don't you feel this way?"


I have two confessions to make before I begin. First, I had to look up the word "lacuna." I felt sure I'd encountered it before, but had absolutely no memory of what it might mean. A lacuna is a piece left out of a manuscript. This has several layers of meaning in the book. Second, I almost put this book down as soon as I'd begun. The book is about Mexico, and I simply don't find Mexico as romantic or intriguing as, say, France. However, because I have the utmost regard for Barbara Kingsolver, I decided to persevere.

The book begins with Harrison Shepherd and his mother huddling together, fearing for their lives on a little island in Mexico, a terrible howling threatening their existence. The howling turns out to be harmless monkeys, gathering in the jungle for a little morning cacophony. Harrison's mother has uprooted him at the age of twelve, moving him from Virginia to Mexico. She has left his father to live as the mistress of a married Mexican diplomat. Harrison calls him Mr. Produce the Cash. Harrison's mother is a flapper, an alcoholic, and extremely immature. She lives to be admired and only appreciates her son inasmuch as he can feed her ego.

When Mr. Produce the Cash fails to produce the cash, Harrison's mother takes in sewing and Harrison fends for himself, first as a plaster mixer, then a cook, for Diego Rivera. Ignorant of Mexican culture, I had to look up Diego Rivera. He is famous for his murals and his politics. He was a communist, a revolutionary, and sheltered Leon Trotsky in exile for a number of years. His wife Frida was also an artist. Harrison works for the Riveras not only as a cook, but as a secretary, translator, driver, and sometimes confidant. Despite, or maybe because, of his lack of filial relationship with his mother, both the Riveras and Trotskys take Harrison under their wings as a son. The story begins in 1929 and continues to 1949, and you may have already realized, as I didn't, that communism plays a large role later in the book, after WWII. Living in Mexico during the revolution, to Harrison, communism was a natural part of life, something he accepted without thinking. In that day, of course, it didn't carry the same stigma it did in the late '40's, and even now.

After Trotsky's assassination, Harrison is at loose ends. The police confiscate the notebooks he has kept since he first moved to Mexico (at the insistence of his mother, for posterity's sake, later for his own sake), as well as the manuscript for his first novel (begun at the insistence of Frida). Frida sends Harrison (Insolito, or Soli, as she calls him) to New York to accompany her paintings. She also sends a painting for Harrison to keep. Harrison, after delivering the paintings, winds up randomly in Asheville, NC. He moves into a boarding house, becomes their cook, and eventually ends up working for the State Department (WWII has commenced, but for reasons unknown until later, Harrison is unfit for military service) moving art objects out of danger.

A couple years later, Harrison begins writing again, becomes quite the successful popular author, hires a stenographer, Violet Brown. As you can see, there is a theme of strong women dominating Harrison throughout the book. Violet isn't so obviously domineering as Harrison's mother or Frida; she exerts a more quiet control. Harrison and Violet live a happy, rather insular life until the rise of "better dead than red." Harrison's past in Mexico as a servant to Rivera and Trotsky comes back to haunt him, and he is prosecuted as a communist. He returns to Mexico with Violet, and the story ends there in the only way it possibly could.

Frida teaches Harrison, "Soli," that the most important part of a person is that which is hidden. She hides a leg shriveled from polio; Harrison hides parts of himself from everybody he meets. He destroys one of his notebooks and that becomes another lacuna. Harrison, as a child, discovers an underwater cave called a lacuna. Kingsolver, throughout the book, leaves out facts on a continual basis, hinting that all will be explained later. Maybe. And it is. Sort of. Kingsolver does not patronize her readers by tying everything up in a neat little bow, explaining everything in minute detail; instead she allows the lacunae to speak for themselves. The book has all sorts of twists and turns, or at least it seems like it at first. Actually, once the twists arrive, you find yourself thinking, "Oh, of course. What else could have happened? I should have seen that."

Throughout the second half of the book, the half mostly set in America, the half with the red scare and Iron Curtain and Un-American committees, I kept thinking of E.L. Doctorow's The Book of Daniel. It's about McCarthyism and the Rosenbergs, a couple accused of being communist spies. In that book, you're never quite sure 1)if they're actually guilty, or 2)who, ultimately, is in the wrong: the Rosenbergs or the government? In Lacuna, the culprit is obviously the American government. Or maybe it goes further back, to WWII, or to that part of human nature willing to listen and believe, rather than think. (See above quotation from the book.) The message of this book is definitely, at least in part, to think. To look past to what is obvious and apparent to that which is below the surface, because that is, as Frida, Harrison, and Violet constantly tell us, is what is most important. Lessons learned about communism (we learn that communism and anti-communism are completely unrelated) can definitely apply to Islam. Xenophobia rules our country because we listen to the commentary without wisdom.

I can't believe I almost didn't read this book because it was about Mexico.

A bit about us: Holly Jean



Holly: I'm really excited about this project even though I'm one of the world's slowest readers. I love reading though, and I'm glad for an excuse to read for pleasure - that is one thing that I don't mind turning into an obligation. I just finished The World According to Garp by John Irving (yesterday, when I should have been writing this term paper), which I enjoyed; I then started Soul on Ice by Eldredge Cleaver (this morning, when I should have been writing this term paper). Oh well...

I'm a junior at UCF, majoring in English Literature. I love what I'm doing right now, but I have no idea what I'll do in the future. I love being outdoors, travelling, and learning about new things. I studied abroad in England this summer and backpacked around a bit, which was amazing. I loved waking up each morning and deciding for myself what I would do all day - where I was going, how I was getting there, etc. It was fun to be able to just sit in a cafe and read if I wanted to, or go on an impromptu hike. When I got back, I decided that I wanted to learn EVERYTHING, signed up for six classes (four of them being lit classes), and have regretted it ever since (ughhhh term paper; two pages down, only eight to go). I'm taking four classes next semester, and I'm really looking forward to it! I'm excited to start reading new books and everyone's posts!

A bit about us: Demerse



Demerse: When I first got an email asking if I was interested in reading fifty books in a year I thought it was a great idea. Then I remembered that there are only 52 weeks in a year. That's about a book a week! (can you tell that I'm a math whiz?!) I love to read but I'm a slow reader so this will be a challenge. The next thought was, "How am I going to figure out what books I want to read?" I looked over at my bookshelf and started counting. There are at least 50 books that I haven't read yet...list completed! (and I don't have to spend more $$$)

On June 16th, 2007 I arrived in Portland, Oregon. It's been 2 years, 5 months, and 16 days and I have not regretted the move from Florida for a second. I grew up in Naples hating the heat and humidity and vowing I would move as soon as I could. I went to school in Tallahassee because I couldn't afford to go out of state. I got a BS in Studio Art and am now an accounting clerk at an art glass manufacturing company. I like...living alone, The Golden Girls, cheese, gin, crocheting. I dislike...papers stapled haphazardly, people who don't listen, not knowing.

A bit about us: Christina




Christina: I'm really excited about reading, and actually having a group of people who seem to love it as much as I do. I have always loved to read, primarily fiction. I also have an uncanny ability to tune out the rest of the world when I'm really into book. This used to get me in trouble in grade school when I would be reading under my desk and not hear my name called, or see my teacher standing over my desk.
I tend go for "junk fiction"; I've read so much nonfiction boring stuff for school, that I like to read something enjoyable in my time. I tend to find an author I like and try to read every book by that author. My guilty pleasure is "historical fiction." At least that's what I tell people, when I'm actually reading historical romance novels.

I love to read, but I'm not a huge fan of writing. When I applied to college, I only applied to schools that didn't require and essay. I admit that I'm a little intimidated by all of the English majors, but I'll probably just read what I like and try to throw a few classics in the mix. I look forward to reading everyone's blogs, getting to know new people and reconnecting with old friends.

A bit about us: Erin



Erin: I initially thought 50 books didn't sound like that much and then I saw DeMerse's math and thought, "oh crap." A book a week?? Yikes! But I'm certainly up for attempting it. I've always been a total bookworm, primarily fiction, though lately I've been branching out.

I live in Chicago. I moved here a little over a year ago from Florida and am still adjusting to having 3 new seasons, but I love the city. Unlike Blythe, I'd been trying to get out of Florida since high school, but it took a while. I'm a filmmaker and work as a freelance editor. I wrote and directed my first feature film in 2007, as part of my master's thesis. It premiered in Los Angeles in October (filmmaking's a very slow process, especially when you're low budget). I haven't been doing much writing since leaving school, so I'm excited about getting back into it and about being forced to read 50 books!

A bit about us: Blythe



Blythe: I got the idea to start this blog after seeing The Fifty Book Project (also on blogspot--check it out). It’s not that I feel the need to add one more thing to do to my life, but I find myself really wanting to be part of a reading community, and I haven’t written for fun in ages. I started my master’s two years ago in an attempt to stretch myself and get back in thinking mode—while I’m sure I have grown, I also feel like the experience has been more draining than enlightening. Or maybe I just discovered that I don’t like thinking and writing papers quite as much as I thought I did!

So here are my intentions: to read, and discuss, and grow. When I read about Fifty Books, it got the wheels churning. Reading on my own? Then writing about the experience? Getting to find out about new books that my friends have read? Actually maintaining (better) contact with some of my long-lost fellow nerds? Doing all of this from the comfort of my own home, where I can stay near my husband, Nate, 2 dogs, couch, and wine supply? (yes, those are ranked in order of importance). The thought was so appealing... plus, like any admitted bookworm, “forcing” myself to read fifty books is like forcing a fat kid to eat another corndog. Damn, that sounds good too, actually.

A bit about us: Pam



Pam: I'm totally psyched about this fifty books project; I read all the time, but so often I choose "junk food books" (like old murder mysteries) and not books that challenge me, books that will make me think. I want to take this opportunity to be more deliberate about my choice of reading material. I don't retain what I read very well, so a few will be books I've read in the past but don't really remember; most, however, I would like to be new books. I enjoy reading classic, literary books, but I also enjoy lighter fiction as well. Let me stress fiction. I rarely enjoy non-fiction, although I feel I should read more and enjoy it more. But I don't. So I think I'll stick with fiction for these fifty books. Maybe for our second fifty book project?

My passions are travel and photography, and, intermittently, writing. I do my best photography when I'm traveling, although I'm trying to do more of it at home. I used to write a lot more than I do now, mostly essays (sort of in the style of Sarah Vowell, something you might hear on This American Life), and that is another reason I'm excited about this project: it will force me to "get black on white" (de Maupassant?).

A bit about us: Amy



Amy: Amy is too busy making jam, drinking beer, and eating waffles to introduce herself, or to explain her reasons for joining in this endeavor, BUT here goes: Amy is a native Floridian currently living in Belgium. She has spent her post-college years in Washington D.C. and Western Europe (primarily France), and has had various jobs, from working in a film-developing shop to helping French students improve their English.

A bit about us: Vanessa



Vanessa: The '50 Books' challenge wouldn't normally be a challenge for me (I'm a fast reader) but I'll be teaching college for the first time in January, starting to work on my thesis and reading from my comp exam book list to take the exam in April so it's going to be rough-going in the beginning for me. Also, I've found myself increasingly impatient with literature - I'm not sure what's going on there but it kind of upsets me. The last amazing book I read was Kurt Vonnegut - Galapagos, right before school started 16 weeks ago. You'll notice me reading a lot of him as we go through this - I want to work through his catalogue and while I originally thought I'd focus mainly on classics, I think instead, I'm just going to focus on allowing myself to enjoy literature again…

I obtained a BA in English Literature from FSU, and in 2007, I was accepted into the MFA program at Naropa University in Boulder, CO. I completed 18 credit hours before coming to UCF to work on an MA in Rhetoric and Composition. Someday, I would like to join the Peace Corps and teach college writing in another country.

Despite that my path is always evolving, my main destination has remained the same for as long as I can remember - writing, guiding others to write, helping others to cope/celebrate/process/understand life via writing practice, fostering the creative spirit, making a difference - one word at a time - as a writer and as a human being.